Search This Blog

"'The Frugal Editor: Do-It-Yourself Editing Secrets for Authors' is a complete course of instruction under one cover." ~ Jim Cox Editor-in-Chief Midwest Book Review


Showing posts with label british language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label british language. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Something Borrowed, Something British: A Mini Rant on Pretentiousness


Something Borrowed, Something British

By Carolyn Howard-Johnson

Alex Williams of The New York Times thinks America Is on a slippery slope to sounding like the Brits.

Though my daughter loves the language spouted by her mentor at UCLA and I have been amused  by some idioms and colloquialisms I've run into over the decades (like "ladder" for a "run" in one's nylons), I can't say I've much noticed.

As proof of this dangerous tendency to copy language that's not understood by any but Americans immersed in our language from the Brits (or worse!, language that shouldn't be adopted), Alex cites:

·        Daniel Gross, an American journalist, who calls Mitt Romney a "bumbling toff."

·        American sci-fi author John Calzi who calls the iPad "a lovely piece of kit.

·        And the use of "fortnight," which I never consider British other than that almost all of the "American" language came from those islands over there near the English Channel.

Williams, in fact, blames New Yorkers for most of these Britishisms and then proceeds to use a whole lot of them—tongue-in-cheek in the British fashion, I'm supposing. They include relatively obnoxious ones like "crikey." But words like "flat" for apartment and "mobile" for cell phone and "holiday" for vacation are hardly new. A "flat" was a "flat" when I lived in New York in something like…oh, forget it. You don't need to know. And though rarely used these ways, we have used "mobile" for "cell phone" and "holiday" for a little vacation for at least a few decades. There are some advantages to being old. It's easy for us to place things in their appropriate decade.

Williams quotes one American editor of the Oxford Dictionary as saying using Britishisms are only "suitable" when there is no American English equivalent, like the word "'twee" for stuff that smacks of Britishness like Laura Ashley dresses. He cautions against using it on the way to the "loo," because he thinks that is "just being pretentious."

Crikey, I'm thinking. Does one have to use a word that most Americans couldn't interpret before being considered "pretentious?" And isn't it awfully British to consider one darn fun word "suitable" when another is just plain "annoying."

I've been speaking English so long I can't be anything but grateful that we "borrowed" it or that they "lent" it to us back in the early days of Plymouth and Jamestown. Besides,I think "'twee" sounds very Alice-in-Wonderlandish. And I'm wondering where we'd be—how much poorer Disney would be—if we hadn't borrowed that masterpiece along with Peter Pan and Alice's literary cousins.
I think most Americans would say, "the cat has been out of the bag for some time and it's way too late to coax it back in."

Carolyn Howard-Johnson is the multi award-winning author of The Frugal Editor (http://budurl.com/TheFrugalEditor) and Great Little Last-Minute Editing Tips for Writers: The Ultimate Frugal Booklet for Avoiding Word Trippers and Crafting Gatekeeper-Perfect Copy (http://budurl.com/WordtrippersPB ). Learn more about her fiction, poetry, and HowToDoItFrugally series of books for writers and retailers at http://HowToDoItFrugally.com. Reprints are available by sending an e-mail for permission to HoJoNews (at) AOL (dot) com.


-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits, consults. and speaks on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success (How To Do It Frugally series of book for writers). Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com/writers_books.htm , where writers will find lists and other helps including Great Little Last-Minute Editing Tips on the Resources for Writers page. She blogs on all things publishing (not just editing!) at her Sharing with Writers blog. She tweets writers' resources at www.twitter.com/frugalbookpromo . Please tweet this post to your followers. We all need a little help with editing. (-:

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Great Editing and Writing IS Great Marketing


I very occasionally run reviews for books I think will help writers on The Frugal, Smart, and Tuned-In Editor.. Hope you'll consider this one. I figure that informed writers are great writers and great writing is one of the best forms of great editing.

Euphemania
Subtitle: Our love affair with euphemisms
By Ralph Keyes
Little Brown and Co.
ISBN: 9780316056564
Nonfiction/ (Writing/Language)
Contact Reviewer: hojoreviews@aol.com

Reviewed by Carolyn Howard-Johnson originally for MyShelf.com
.

If you don’t love language, it’s a good bet you aren’t a writer. But if you’re a writer, reading more about language (linguistics (?)) may not be high on your list of priorities. It’s so integral to the way you think, you believe you don’t need it.


I believe that Euphemania by Ralph Keyes will change your mind. Written with humor (because euphemisms are just naturally funny?) this book will certainly entertain. If you’ve ever wondered about the intricacies of our euphemisms—the origins as an example—this is the book for you. But who would have guessed that it also might be the perfect book to hone the skills of writers of dialogue and humor?

Academic writers? Use it as a quick-study on how to write a book that will sell to a wide market. The secret? Voice. Humor. Colloquialisms. Yep, and euphemisms. A book does not have to have the lack of moisture content (dry!) of a text book to be a textbook. I know about academic expectations. My daughter is a Ph.D. candidate. She explains it to me all the time. Having said that, if you’d like to actually sell something rather than giving everything away to unappreciative academic journals, try rewriting your brilliant theory for the general public!

Anthropologists and linguists will love this book, too. But mostly, it’s just fun learning why we use asterisks for words like sh*t and the euphemisms like the f-word. It’s also tons of fun to identify phrases we’ve stopped thinking of as euphemisms (love handles, anyone?), just because they are so part of our everyday language.

If I were rating this book for an Amazon review, it would give it a true (not a fake) five-star rating. For usefulness. For fun. For the love of language. 

-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits, consults. and speaks on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success (How To Do It Frugally series of book for writers). Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com/writers_books.htm , where writers will find lists and other helps including Great Little Last-Minute Editing Tips on the Resources for Writers page. She blogs on all things publishing (not just editing!) at her Sharing with Writers blog. She tweets writers' resources at www.twitter.com/frugalbookpromo . Please tweet this post to your followers. We all need a little help with editing. (-:

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Vernacular Peeves or Americanisms I Love to Hate

My last blog on Americanisms brought me some private e-mail on the differences between British and American English. I thought it would be fun to hear from a British editor. One never knows what we can learn from one another--we two overseas cousins. So here's a guest post from Maggie Lyons:

Vernacular Peeves, or Americanisms I Love to Hate

by Maggie Lyons


The American vernacular is full of ungrammatical phrases and words that may add realistic zest to your novel’s dialogue but can also sneak into your writing or your speech when you least want to be colorful—when creating a book proposal or during an interview, for instance. Here are a few examples that take the enamel off my teeth.


She could care less about the spelling errors in her prose: This means, “She cares about the spelling errors, but she could care less,” to which you might reply, “Would she care less about the errors if I paid her a big enough advance to care less about them?”

Correction: She couldn’t care less about the spelling errors in her prose.


I’m waiting on my editor: If your editor ordered a dirty Martini and chocolate-coated ants, and you are his waiter, this phrase would not be a problem—though your editor’s culinary preferences might be. If you are waiting because your editor is late, then this is a problem.

Correction: I’m waiting for my editor.

“As far as our readers,” the publisher said, “we offer excellent value.” Did the publisher mean he offered “excellent value” to everyone except his readers—up to but not including his readers? Assuming this is an unreasonable interpretation of the phrase—or is it in this era of corporate licence?—a verb must be added for the sake of grammar and clarity.

Correction: “As far as concerns our readers . . .”

I am so not blogging: Apart from the fact that not blogging could be a major marketing oversight, when “so” means “very,” it can’t be used with a verb.

Correction: I’m not blogging, or I’m against blogging, or I don't blog, and so on.

How did Starving Author’s presentation at the library go? He did good: Assuming Starving Author was not being altruistic and doing good for the library community, an adverb is needed here, not an adjective.

Correction: He did well.

It’s a real nice bookstore: Unless this sentence means the bookstore is a real store as opposed to a virtual one, in which case a comma should follow “real” (a real, nice bookstore), the adjective “real” should be replaced by an adverb.

Correction: It’s a really nice bookstore.

Irregardless of the fact that she led a boring life, she produced extraordinarily imaginative memoires.

Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary politely categorizes “irregardless” as “nonstandard.” “Irregardless” is a double negative and, literally interpreted, means the opposite of regardless.

Correction: Regardless of the fact . . .

When we go to the sci-fi book launch party next weekend, let’s bring some aliens from Mars: “Bring” implies an action in the present or at the point of arrival. Because the book launch is in the future—next weekend—we are still at the point of departure, which requires the use of the verb “to take.”

Correction: When we go to the sci-fi book launch party next weekend, let’s take some aliens from Mars.

The public relations department has distributed their press release: Presumably the public relations department did not distribute another group’s press release, which is what the above sentence implies. Don’t mix singular and plural in reference to nouns that refer to groups of people. The singular verb “has distributed” should be complemented with the singular possessive adjective “its.”

Correction: The public relations department has distributed its press release.

If I would have known J. K. Rolling was going to judge the writing contest, I would have entered my book of spells: There is a “would” in this sentence that casts no charm.

Correction: If I had known J. K. Rolling was going to judge the writing contest, I would have entered my book of spells.

There’s two good reasons why my book was rejected: I suggest that one reason was grammar.

Correction: There are two good reasons why my book was rejected.

Now let’s have your pet peeves.

~Maggie Lyons is a freelance editor of almost everything, including academic and business documents, fiction and nonfiction manuscripts, ESL documents, and Web content, and she edits both British and American English. See her website for more grammar goodies at http://lyonseditorialservices.com. She is also a children’s writer (http://www.maggielyons.yolasite.com) with two books for middle-grade readers to be released later this year by MuseItUp Publishing (http://museituppublishing.com).

-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits, consults. and speaks on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success (How To Do It Frugally series of book for writers). Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com/writers_books.htm , where writers will find lists and other helps including Great Little Last-Minute Editing Tips on the Resources for Writers page. She blogs on all things publishing (not just editing!) at her Sharing with Writers blog. She tweets writers' resources at www.twitter.com/frugalbookpromo . Please tweet this post to your followers. We all need a little help with editing. (-:

Saturday, April 3, 2010

In the News: Our Changing Language

National Geographic reports that new study helps us predict which words in our language and 86 related Indo-European languages will change and how fast. Generally, the ones we use the most like “I”, “two,” and “who” are least likely to change. Verbs and adjectives change faster than nouns, numbers and pronouns. They ask “Will local lingo be homogenized in this age of global media?” And answer, “Not necessarily . . . [think of] the stiff British resistance to “couch” for “sofa.” There was no mention of why they call a run in a stocking a “ladder.” And THAT’s always been my question!

I've ordered the book you see here. I haven't read it, so it isn't a reccommendation, just a possiblitiy for pursuing this subject if you're interested.

-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits, consults and speaks on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0978515870. Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com, where writers will find lists and other helps on the Resources for Writers page. She blogs on all things publishing (not just editing!) at her Sharing with Writers blog.
Find me tweeting writers' resources at www.twitter.com/frugalbookpromo. And please tweet this post to your followers. We all need a little help with editing. (-: