Search This Blog

"'The Frugal Editor: Do-It-Yourself Editing Secrets for Authors' is a complete course of instruction under one cover." ~ Jim Cox Editor-in-Chief Midwest Book Review


Showing posts with label colloquial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colloquial. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Something Borrowed, Something British: A Mini Rant on Pretentiousness


Something Borrowed, Something British

By Carolyn Howard-Johnson

Alex Williams of The New York Times thinks America Is on a slippery slope to sounding like the Brits.

Though my daughter loves the language spouted by her mentor at UCLA and I have been amused  by some idioms and colloquialisms I've run into over the decades (like "ladder" for a "run" in one's nylons), I can't say I've much noticed.

As proof of this dangerous tendency to copy language that's not understood by any but Americans immersed in our language from the Brits (or worse!, language that shouldn't be adopted), Alex cites:

·        Daniel Gross, an American journalist, who calls Mitt Romney a "bumbling toff."

·        American sci-fi author John Calzi who calls the iPad "a lovely piece of kit.

·        And the use of "fortnight," which I never consider British other than that almost all of the "American" language came from those islands over there near the English Channel.

Williams, in fact, blames New Yorkers for most of these Britishisms and then proceeds to use a whole lot of them—tongue-in-cheek in the British fashion, I'm supposing. They include relatively obnoxious ones like "crikey." But words like "flat" for apartment and "mobile" for cell phone and "holiday" for vacation are hardly new. A "flat" was a "flat" when I lived in New York in something like…oh, forget it. You don't need to know. And though rarely used these ways, we have used "mobile" for "cell phone" and "holiday" for a little vacation for at least a few decades. There are some advantages to being old. It's easy for us to place things in their appropriate decade.

Williams quotes one American editor of the Oxford Dictionary as saying using Britishisms are only "suitable" when there is no American English equivalent, like the word "'twee" for stuff that smacks of Britishness like Laura Ashley dresses. He cautions against using it on the way to the "loo," because he thinks that is "just being pretentious."

Crikey, I'm thinking. Does one have to use a word that most Americans couldn't interpret before being considered "pretentious?" And isn't it awfully British to consider one darn fun word "suitable" when another is just plain "annoying."

I've been speaking English so long I can't be anything but grateful that we "borrowed" it or that they "lent" it to us back in the early days of Plymouth and Jamestown. Besides,I think "'twee" sounds very Alice-in-Wonderlandish. And I'm wondering where we'd be—how much poorer Disney would be—if we hadn't borrowed that masterpiece along with Peter Pan and Alice's literary cousins.
I think most Americans would say, "the cat has been out of the bag for some time and it's way too late to coax it back in."

Carolyn Howard-Johnson is the multi award-winning author of The Frugal Editor (http://budurl.com/TheFrugalEditor) and Great Little Last-Minute Editing Tips for Writers: The Ultimate Frugal Booklet for Avoiding Word Trippers and Crafting Gatekeeper-Perfect Copy (http://budurl.com/WordtrippersPB ). Learn more about her fiction, poetry, and HowToDoItFrugally series of books for writers and retailers at http://HowToDoItFrugally.com. Reprints are available by sending an e-mail for permission to HoJoNews (at) AOL (dot) com.


-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits, consults. and speaks on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success (How To Do It Frugally series of book for writers). Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com/writers_books.htm , where writers will find lists and other helps including Great Little Last-Minute Editing Tips on the Resources for Writers page. She blogs on all things publishing (not just editing!) at her Sharing with Writers blog. She tweets writers' resources at www.twitter.com/frugalbookpromo . Please tweet this post to your followers. We all need a little help with editing. (-:

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Subscriber Suggests Having Some Fun with Pop Culture Sayings

I love it when I hear from subscribers and visitors, expecially when they're sharing ideas that make the subject of language even more fun. So, here's to Pop Culture Sayings and Katina! Click on her link. Let's make her Web site statistics soar!


Hi,

My name is Katina and I work with Onlinecollege.org. We recently published an article that you may be interested in entitled, "50 Funniest Pop Culture Sayings That Made it to the Dictionary ".

I thought perhaps you'd be interested in sharing this article with your readers? After having followed your blog for a while, I feel that this one article would align well with your blog's subject matter. If interested, here's the link for your convenience: (http://www.onlinecollege.org/2010/08/03/50-funniest-pop-culture-sayings-that-made-it-to-the-dictionary/ ).

Either way, I hope you continue putting out great content through your blog. It has been a sincere pleasure to read. Thanks for your time!

Thanks

Katina Solomon

-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits, consults and speaks on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0978515870. Learn more about her other authors' aids at http://www.howtodoitfrugally.com/, where writers will find lists and other helps on the Resources for Writers page. She blogs on all things publishing (not just editing!) at her Sharing with Writers blog. Find me tweeting writers' resources at www.twitter.com/frugalbookpromo. And please tweet this post to your followers. We all need a little help with editing. (-:

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Editor Boyd Sutton, Dangling Participles and the Ewwww or Eiew Factor

You will find a conversation between Boyd Sutton, one of my fellows at Word_Mage @ yahoogroups.com and me. He gave me permission to share with you.

Boyd said:

Yep, I caught the grammar vs. grammatical, Carolyn. Good for you. And thanks
for remembering me.

When you started talking about dangling participles I had two reactions. First, my eyes started glazing over. Grammar terms. Eiew! Embarrassment came next. I couldn't define a dangling participle if it were the $1,000,000 question.

But wait! You noted that there was an entire chapter devoted to it in The Frugal Editor. So I went immediately to TFE and found the chapter on DPs and gerunds. Eiew! Another grammar term. But it was a joy to read. You have the same "eiew" response to such terms and made it painless for me.

Now, I have another "editorial" question for you and the gang. What do you call it when people add an unnecessary word, as in, "He dialed up the girl's number." I see this all the time. In my critique group, I just say, "as opposed to 'dialed down' the girl's number?" and they get the point. It also shows up in "conjured up," "winnowed down," and on and on. What's that called? Grammarians (nope, it's not "grammers"), with all their fancy names and terms, must have a high-falutin term for that.

Boyd Sutton, Editor, the
Wisconsin Writers' Journal, www.wrwa.net

From Carolyn:

Boyd, I call it "colloquial." Or on second thought, maybe "redundant." Ha! But then you already read that I'm not much for all those terms that make us nod off when anything remotely related to grammar comes up.

Notice I didn't say "colloquial usage." I have a strong dislike of words that end with "age." Not just because of my age, either. Like "signage." Seems we already have a perfectly good word for that. It's "signs." Seems we're just trying to sound high falutin' with an extra syllable. But "dialed up" adds a whole new word, not just an extra syllable. So in this case, I'd consider another term for your example. Consider "dumbing down." Ahem.

LOL. You asked.
---
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits and consults on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success on Amazon. Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Our Mongrel Language Adopts Words So Fast We're Reaching for Millionish Status

Paul Payack, the guru behind Global Language Monitor, a language consulting business, and owner of YourDictionary.com which features a vocabulary building service I use to deliver a vocabulary word a day to my e-mail box, says that there are now nearly 995,000 words in English and that the language is growing so fast that it will butt the million mark sometime this year. By contrast, Spanish has 275,000 words and French only about 100,000. That's because the French have been very busy keeping their language pure while English appears to relish its mongrel status. Of course, the internet has hurried the process along.

The story on this trend by Stevenson Swanson for the Chicago Tribune gives us a list of some of the newbies in a sidebar. They are:

Billary: Bill and Hillary Clinton
Godzone: A humorous name for New Zealand derived by combining the first two words of their motto "God's own country."
Locavore: Someone who eats only food produced or grown locally.
Blankie: Anyone who has children has known this word for a long time but it was just added to the Oxford English Dictionary.

English not only borrows words from other languages, our immigrants combine them for us. So, the article says, we have words like "Chinglish" from which we got phrases like "no noising" which means "quiet." Remember the indie movie in which the hispanic father dissed "Spanglish." He wanted to keep his Espanol pure but his kids who were raised American, didn't much care and mixed their two languages shamelessly to his chagrin.

It wasn't mentioned but poets, too, play with the language and sometimes it sticks. I often push words together to make one word and sometimes combine two words into one that sort of sound like what they are meant to describe. The other day I said in a casual e-mail something about "snoofing." Georgia Richardson, queen of humor and contributing editor for BoomerWoemenSpeak.com, demanded to know what it meant. I new what I meant by it but couldn't at first figure out how I had come up with it. Now I believe it is a combination of "sniff" and "Snoopy" of cartoon fame. This process is something I mention in my book, The Frugal Editor for it is something a good editor must contend with. Do we as editors or author-editors omit such words or do we encourage originality and the contribution such coinages make to the language? I lean toward the latter, but it is always a choice.

That something like like this should not be dictated by dictionaries often surprises the rule-oriented. As it happens, we may be the ones who tell the builders of dictionaries what to put in them as the other way around.

Now, I have to wonder if some of my typos may someday be included in the next edition of Webster's.

-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson edits and consults on issues of publishing. Find her The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success on Amazon. Learn more about her other authors' aids at www.howtodoitfrugally.com.